“Oh my God, it’s the new Marc Jacobs! This is sold out everywhere. Where did you get this?”
“Miranda didn’t want it, so…”
“No, no, no, no. This bag is, like, $1,900. I cannot take this from you.”
Puts her stuff inside the bag
Sure you can Lily, just stop being such a terrible friend. On the plus side though, you (the readers, not Lily) probably get the sentiment behind Marc Jacobs.
In fact, Amanda has it (and her obsession about it was featured in The New York Times!), Lucy has it and so do Rihanna and Beyoncé (at least they once did, do stars sell their handbags?). The Marc Jacobs Stam at one point was everything that any designer could hope to achieve. Propelled and fuelled by the It-bag trend, as well as scores of other successful designs from Jacobs himself like the Dr. Q Groovee, the excitement that the enigmatic designer stirred among the masses is palpable from The Devil Wears Prada dialogue above.
Arguably the most darling designer of the early-aughts, Jacobs’ story, as he proclaims himself, is much like a film. Literally ready to “kill for a job” at Charivari, an extremely of-the-moment avant-garde fashion retailer in 1979, at the age of sixteen he started off working in their stockroom. Before long, his accolade of the CFDA Perry Ellis Award for New Fashion Talent in 1987 positioned him as Vice President of women’s design at Perry Ellis, and his friend Robert Duffy, former Bergdorf Goodman buyer and Reuben Thomas executive, as its President. However in 1992 during the shoot of Sonic Youth’s “Sugar Kane” in the Ellis showroom, Jacobs’ debut spring 1993 collection changed everything. It was the very first time “grunge” fashion was presented under a luxury label, a stint which earned him both acclaim and criticism. Possibly a severance package too but I digress.
It was then that Jacobs and Duffy became thoroughly immersed in furthering the Marc Jacobs International Company, L.P., and he, along with friends like Kate Moss and Naomi Campbell, as well as the indie-music scene he was involved in, defined New York fashion of the nineties. In 1997, LVMH offered Jacobs the role of Creative Director of Louis Vuitton – in exchange of investing in Marc Jacobs – a job which few designers have been able to execute so efficiently and aggressively. Very quickly Louis Vuitton saw a tremendous rise from a historic luggage brand to one of the most prominent and daring fashion houses of the century.
In 2001, Jacobs launched Marc by Marc Jacobs, a younger, quirkier and lower-priced range that focused on the youth who coveted the main line’s luxurious cashmeres and butter soft bags but couldn’t afford them. In the decade that followed, he launched collection after collection of pure amazement, starting from the quilted Stam in 2005 (and the multipocket hobo in DWP that had us all fangirl-ing) to the fabulous collaborations he did under Vuitton with Yayoi Kusama, Takashi Murakami and Stephen Sprouse, whose Neverfulls honestly still leave us breathless.
However after retiring from his pivotal role at Louis Vuitton the excitement around Jacobs seemed to wane. In 2015, much to the horror of its most ardent fans, the MbMJ line was discontinued, even though only a year prior, British designers Katie Hillier and Luella Bartley were recruited to revamp the brand. The duo was behind the pretty successful release of the Francesca Q and Hillier Hobo bags. This followed some highly publicized business struggles by Jacobs, with Duffy stepping down from CEO’s position in March of that year, and in 2017, Bernard Arnault of LVMH expressed that he was more worried about Jacobs than Trump (then the new President). His Fall 2018 show featured a barren stage with rows of chairs and was likened by a critic to a “sumptuous funeral”. Jacobs himself has admitted to the fact that he doesn’t know what Gen Z wants, and he refuses to get up to speed and jump on the bandwagon like many other contemporary designers.
Does that mean, though, that he is no longer relevant?
The story of Marc Jacobs is very much a tale of the quintessential American dream, and like his predecessors in the industry such as Donna Karan, Calvin Klein and Ralph Lauren, he brought in something entirely new like streetwear into high fashion.
Nonchalant chic – if there was ever a phrase that could sum up a brand perfectly, it would be this, and the brand in reference would be Marc Jacobs. Sadly though, times seems to have changed, and with the advent of prêt-à-porter, both nonchalance and chic is far too accessible, leaving consumers wondering whether American brands remain as relevant as they were. However, brands too, like people, have many facets to them, and Marc Jacobs’ most admirable one is that he refuses to remain conventional.
As Jacobs himself said in an interview with Thora Siemsen, “Some designers, especially of a certain generation, look at things by younger creators and they don’t realize they’re doing exactly what people did to them. It’s a very dangerous place to be, when you start to judge and think it’s your way or it’s wrong.”
So while Jacobs is in a transitional state, his collection, now under the identity of The Marc Jacobs, may perhaps be described as nonchalant chic trying to compete at both contemporary price points and occasionally higher end ones too, but let’s not be too quick to label, shall we? He still has to come to terms with the fact that online is the way to go forward, and maybe define a specific market for himself (who could very well be Gen Z buyers too)! Who knows, perhaps they’ll be the ones most open to changes and new trends and experiences, and that’s what Jacobs does best.
And Jacobs is no stranger to making tough decisions, nor is he unwilling to embrace change, whether it was his physical transformation, as described by Ariel Levy for the New Yorker, from “a withdrawn schlump in eyeglasses,” into someone “muscular, bronzed, shining with diamonds,” or perhaps the more spiritual one that he has undergone during the pandemic. Until then, I’m seriously digging these bags from The Marc Jacobs line, and crossing my fingers that the Stam makes a comeback—I’d really like to see more of its Manhattan version!
The Snapshot ($350)
Relatively tame compared to the version seen in Emily in Paris, I seriously love this gilded version, which is actually a very dressy, slightly oversized clutch that can double as a camera bag.
The Softbox ($395)
A (much) cheaper alternative to the Loewe Puzzle, it’s also a lot more convenient thanks to the lack of a flap and the double zips, although the huge “Marc Jacobs” logo is a slight (read: dead) giveaway.
The Leopard Backpack ($275)
Made of canvas, spacious and can hold probably everything, this is a backpack I’m really liking, even though I’m of the opinion that backpacks make you look like a mule.
The Editor Crossbody Bag ($425)
If you really want a color for spring, I’d suggest you go for MJ’s yellow/oranges because they are to DIE for!
The Director ($450)
If you want a bag that looks truly professional and makes you look like you’re a person in control, clearly you’re the Director. Wait, I mean you need the Director. The pop of blue in the interior is just right!
His brand has become a total joke.
This may be the most profound statement ever!
I love love love my MBMJ bags and I had a canvas tote that read:
Jacobs by Marc Jacobs
For Marc by Marc Jacobs
In collaboration with Marc Jacobs for Marc Jacobs
Truly hilarious
I really admire this bit of whimsy that’s always associated with Jacobs! It’s also a bit like Hermès, that way; it’s 404 error pages are called “Darn Internet!”!
All these bags are awful. All I see is TJMaxx
I do not miss Marc Jacobs. He made clothes for women as if he hated our bodies. Michael Kors designs clothes that make women look and feel beautiful. Marc Jacobs designed clothes to hide in. “Look at my dress (not my waist!)- it’s a wacky print and new take on a balloon shape!” Hard pass.
No matter how famous or fabulous the model wearing his clothes was, the clothes ALWAYS wore her, and never the other way around.
I do have quite a bit of nostalgia for his bags though. With the top handle trend coming back strong this year I’m surprised we haven’t seen a reimagined/ updated stam!
I can see what you mean by the clothes wearing the person. But yeah I think since Jacobs is more of a trend-definer than a follower, he’d much rather wait to come up with something new than follow the trend that’s going strong now. You can see that pillow bags are EVERYWHERE now.
I don’t know – maybe start by leaving Marc Jacobs out of department stores?
He had such a HUGE moment. I remember lining up with my mom and her friends waiting for his stores to open in New York. I think his brand was not managed well over the years. But MJ is doing fine, enjoying his life…if he wants to, he can save his brand like Coach saved their brand. It’s definitely not too late!
Coach has had an evolution of periods when we liked it to periods when we hated it and now back to when it’s recovered. I hope Jacobs can do the same!
Honestly, all Marc had to do was change nothing and keep doing what he did. He was doing so fabulous and all these changes since leaving LV has ruined his brand. I was just revisiting his old collections from the 2000s till 2015ish and they’re all fabulous!
The thing with gen-z is that so many older folks think we are high maintenance and need something completely different/have a completely new vision. The reality I feel like is that we all just want to bring the old stuff back!
^I’m strictly talking about fashion here.
Sales of RTW at LV were not meeting expectations that’s why he was invited to leave as creative director.
He felt like the MbMJ line was not in line with his vision anymore, and it’s truly an immensely difficult to discontinue a successful brand. I think that’s a conflict every designer faces, that of whether to stick with a brand that’s just a successful corporation or something that truly aligns with his character, and I’m sure he’ll come back with something just as edgy and chic. For us Gen Z-ers who love his old collections, there’s always the pre-owned market!
This is truly a riches to rags story. It’s unfortunate and a bit sad.
But has the story ended? We don’t know. And that’s what makes me hopeful.
He has immense talent but I think his personal life was a bit of a trainwreck for a while. I am glad to see he’s found some equilibrium lately and would love to see him come back to the level of prominence he had in the 2000s. (I’m also going to be honest and say that some of the business decisions being made a few years ago, like spinning off the former MbMJ styles to off-price really bugged me, especially when there was so much disingenuousness about it).
Yes, he’s really been working on a spiritual recovery during the pandemic (as per Thora Siemsens’s article), so we hope he’ll know which way to take his line to now!
The logo was always a turn off for me … the big name splash … hate that on any bag.
You must not own any LV, Gucci, Prada, Balenciaga, Chanel, Dior shall I go own….cuz their names are splashed on their bags
There are plenty of bags that do not have conspicuous monogramming. Even the MJ Snapshot doesn’t.
The Editor bag looks like a Prada knockoff. Polene offers the Numero Un in a striking yellow that has a distinctive silhouette. It’s not just a copy of somebody else’s work. I have a 6 yo Prada made-in-Italy vitello daino tote (still in excellent condition despite regular use) that is a much better, more attractive version of the Director and I paid just over $500 for it (sale price at KaDeWe in Berlin). So I’m not seeing anything here worth more than a passing glance.
That said, my former manager had a great Marc Jacobs hobo bag and I would love to see that in stores again.
Marc Jacobs is very well known for its hobos (especially the one from DWP!).
Honestly, for me MJ will always be relevant. It’s the first designer bag I could save for and afford back in the time (2005) and I still have it. Hope he will sort his stuff out and makes a comeback. Also re-release the Stam would be a dream!
So glad for you! I truly hope he makes a comeback too!
sad case of what drugs and prostitutes can do to an exceptional talent
Sadly yes, thankfully he has been rehabilitated and in the COVID-19 isolation, has undergone a spiritual recovery.
https://www.vogue.com/article/marc-jacobs-basic-outfit-heels-skirt he seems delusional to me at this point – way more out of touch with reality than I’ve seen him in the past
Yeah… He’s been working on making videos and playing different characters apparently. I guess it’s a part of that. Hard to say really.
I loved MBMJ. I absolutely hate these designs.
I can understand the sentiment. Hopefully MbMJ-styles will make a comeback (fingers crossed!)