Whether we are beginners in the market, seasoned buyers, or simply people who’ve been watching others carrying handbags, pretty much all of us have our fair share of purse pet peeves. Some might be centered around the very existence of a top-zip, while for others, the lack of said zipper is a big no-no.
And while purse peeves are a real problem for us handbag-lovers who would have otherwise adored the beautiful design of a bag had it not been for its contrasting quilting, they are subjective to a large degree. They are also likely to vary between individuals depending on their own ideals of functionality, trendiness, and style.
But, one can’t really deny that there are certain – if I may say so – widely acknowledged elements to handbags that can make them look significantly less expensive than they actually are. And while not all of them are likely to cause equal exasperation to all users, steering clear of them, whether you’re purchasing a high-end or a contemporary purse, is more likely to leave you feeling satisfied. After all, we’ve heard countless times that the devil is in the details, and these bothersome details, in particular, could prove to be dealbreakers when it comes to choosing the right handbag.
So what are they? I thought you’d never ask!
Texture/Materials
Whenever you’re veering out of the leather territory, be it velvet, denim, PVC, linen, tweed, fur, or faux leather, you run the risk of losing the purse’s luxury appeal. While I’ve questioned countless times whether a particular denim purse is designer or an Etsy DIY, transparent PVC bags rarely look even slightly luxurious. And faux leather is something that’s almost always advisable to avoid – their exaggerated pebbly texture or their oily waxy shine is a dead giveaway. Plus, most start peeling within at best a year’s worth of use – an eyesore on all counts.
However, genuine leather, at times, presents its own set of challenges that make your purse look less dignified – a metallic shade or patent leather, while relatively versatile, can look rather tacky if executed in a sloppy way, while smooth leather that’s covered in scratches isn’t a look one might want to opt for either. On the other hand, distressed leather, unless done in a highly specific, Balenciaga-chic Olsen-like manner, might just end up earning pitiful glances from onlookers. And finally, suede without a good nap and not well cared for frankly looks a lot like burlap rather than something that costs a pretty penny.
Hardware
Overly shiny hardware not only draws undue attention but can look gaudy as well. But dull brass isn’t particularly pleasing to the eye either, and more often than not, might end up looking like the aforementioned shiny hardware tarnished to this point.
At the same time, metal chains need to look and feel like they have a certain weight – dinky, lightweight ones appear low-quality and flimsy. Similarly, fragile hardware is also a functional pet peeve – you never know when the clasp will randomly pop open, and your belongings go tumbling down.
Flimsy hardware also tends to be rickety – a Bottega Chain Pouch dupe from River Island that I once saw on an acquaintance looked pretty cool for a hot second. That is until she actually maneuvered to open the purse – the terrible jammed-up hardware ensued some squeaking and was enough to dismiss any admiration I had towards the particular bag.
But the lack of certain hardware, like metal feet, feels inexpensive too – not only does it make the purse more prone to falling over, but also susceptible to dirt and damage.
Zippers
While zippers should technically fall under hardware, zipper-related troubles are simply too many! Certain zips tend to be so jagged that they scrape the user’s hand and hurt the skin. Similarly, the quality of the zipper itself matters – they should move smoothly and quietly, but not be so slippery that they slide open by themselves. But the biggest nuisance I find when it comes to zippers is metal zipper ends. Zipper ends that hang open aren’t a particularly good look. A better alternative is to have them tucked in like the Céline Luggage Tote, right? But certain purses tend to have little plasticky bits of metal at the zipper ends and that’s probably my biggest pet peeve – nothing cheapens a purse as much as a metal zipper end. Okay, I’m done ranting now.
Craftsmanship
When stitches are visible, it becomes of crucial importance that they are straight, small, and unobtrusive. A lot of brands also tend to deploy contrast-stitching as a design feature, so that makes any flaws or crooked seams all the more apparent. At the same time, as we see on the Coach Willow Tote, the two edges seem to be sewn/glued together, which can devalue an aesthetic. Even besides that, crooked logos, thin, flimsy-looking straps (which the Neverfull is guilty of), and other such technicalities tend to leave us with an impression we don’t quite expect of a four-figure purse.
Recognizability
With one group of designers assiduously supporting monograms and another religiously shunning them, are they, after all, tacky? The jury’s still out on that, but most agree that logos, especially from contemporary brands, rarely exude a luxury aesthetic. But do you know what does feel gimmicky? Brand names or initials on stuff in a HUGE font.
Trendiness
Speaking of on-trend monograms, something that really looks inexpensive is an obvious knockoff of a high-end designer bag that’s hot right now – not just among high-street retailers but also imitations from other brands that mirror the original way too closely – a giveaway that you have chosen something cheaper than what you actually wanted.
At the same time though, if you’re going for something that’s exactly the polar opposite of what’s on-trend right now, you run the risk of looking dated, or at the very least “unfashionable”. As PurseForum member glendaPLEASE describes, “RN, it seems like small, structured, top handle and multi-wearable bags are hot hot hot, so something the complete opposite of that, like a big slouchy hobo bag, looks outdated in comparison.”
So that was my round-up of design features that can cheapen the overall outlook of a purse, regardless of whether it’s designer, an affordable luxury, or from the high street. But ever so often, it isn’t a particular physical property, but rather the psychological response it triggers, that makes us perceive certain features as inexpensive-looking. In fact, some might argue that any well-taken care of and put together purse can look expensive.
So, what do you think makes handbags look inexpensive?
While contrary to others I find lv monogram bags to be very tacky and cheap!
LV monograms are the tackiest thing ever. Full stop. I literally roll my eyes every time I see one. I am sorry, it is just a fact.
That’s not contrary to others at all. It’s the most common opinion people have about lv monogram there is. Somehow everyone who dislikes it thinks they’re the only one, to the point where they just haaaave to say it, and also include that they’re contrarian for good measure. Obviously this is the most upvoted comment, very predictable and boring.
Relax this is a discussion about fashion not politics.
You come across a little on the jealous side unfortunately!
I’m not reading jealousy, but a strongly opinionated individual. I don’t like everything “she?” writes, but I respect that she can hold her own under the barrage of negative comments aimed at her.
The ‘barrage of negative comments’ says it all really.
I just laugh when I read such strong judgmental comments about a tote bag. I have invested in other designer bags but I will always love ❤️ the coated canvas bags and logo…classic and clearly enduring. Why can’t you let people like what bags they like without passing judgement. It has zero impact on you. It really seems like it’s more about you projecting your need to achieve “status” via a handbag.
I agree, but we can’t deny it does an exceptional job when it comes to being a status symbol, and lots of people want that even though they might not openly admit it.
Agree! Carrying a Louis Vuitton Neverfull is like living in a McMansion.
I agree. To each their own, but I personally just don’t find the aesthetic appealing, especially in canvas. The only bag I’d buy from LV is maybe the capucines. The leather looks nice and I don’t mind the logo in front.
I think Louis Vuitton (and well, most bags with a well-known monogram range) try to cater to lots of different audiences. So besides the monogram canvas, there’s the empreinte, the epi and, as Eryn mentioned, Capucines and other leather (Taurillon, I think) options. And it’s very natural that not all of us would like every range offered, so yeah, to each their own.
Personally, I don’t care if others think that I look dated. I’m just not a trendy person. I like what I like, and I’m not looking for anyone’s approval.
I’ve seen some pretty cheap looking bags from luxury designers. Some have even felt cheap. Quality doesn’t have to be expensive.
I don’t give 2 hoots what anyone thinks about my bag. If they want to critique and/or criticize me then please buy me a bag; otherwise, they can troll someone else.
On the other hand, because of the expensive, low quality of Chanel bags I’m looking at vintage. I purchased and received today a 20 year old vintage bag, even hubby was impressed with the quality and sustainability.
Hello Namesake! You have just given me food for thought. I cannot agree more. Everytime I’ve held a brand new Chanel bag in hand and about to pay for it, cannot justify paying all that money for something that looks so low quality and always end up leaving and walking away. So maybe I shall go the vintage route too.
I don’t think looking dated is such a bad thing, at least not anymore. I see so many people trying to create a certain aesthetic, sometimes even unconsciously, like 60s-era or 80s-era which, come to think of it, is a “dated” look but with a purpose. I was also reading about this TPFer speaking about how she saw this lady carrying a Chloe Silverado looking effortlessly stylish. Also, often older styles are said to be better quality, so kudos to you for keeping true to yourself!
^^^This! 100 percent!!!
I defer to the Supreme Court, but in a different context. “In 1964, Justice Potter Stewart tried to explain “hard-core” pornography, or what is obscene, by saying, “I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced… [b]ut I know it when I see it …”
Sometimes, words can’t adequately describe what I want to express and this quote is usually my fallback.
I can’t stop laughing 😂
It’s unfortunate when people have beautiful, expensive handbags and they don’t keep them clean. There is a popular YouTuber I watch that has good handbag videos. She is always pulling trash out of them like candy wrappers. You can visibly see the lint and abuse when she shows the inside of her handbags. She has a good size collection, too. I’m more about keeping your collection small enough to maintain. It looks so much more elegant to have a cared for bag and well used handbag than a dirty, trendy one. I try to be like Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy. She used to have one daily handbag for at least a year. If you look at her pictures she did not sway with the trends.
That’s a very elegant way to put it, and yes, even though our handbags tend to become a repository for our daily miscellany, the more we take care of it, the better it looks. Thank you!
I don’t like saffiano. My first premium designer bag was a Prada Galleria (purchased online) and I found that the waxy finish looked/felt cheap to me. I associate luxury with rich, soft leathers that make you want to touch and smell them.
I agree. the saffiano looks cheap because all the low level brands use a material that looks just like it and that’s where my mind goes automatically
One of the first bags I bought myself was a Michael Kors made of saffiano. When I was in high school I always wanted the Prada Galleria, but after I tried one on in person I just thought “I could get something from Michael Kors for a fraction of the price.”
I thought the leather was great for a throw around bag, especially for school and college age where I didn’t have a choice and had to place my bag on the ground during class. I wouldn’t get any Saffiano bag today though.
Indeed, every contemporary brand seems to have a Prada Saffiano lookalike at this point.
+1 about Saffiano. It just feels like cheap faux leather to me, regardless of the price.
I love Epsom and Saffiano! I think while I do love the soft leathers, the problem for me personally is that they are not practical for everyday use, because they get dinged up so quickly! The advantage of having the leathers stamped is durability! But yes if you are in a position to baby your handbags it is nice to have the luxe feel of unstamped leathers!
I do understand but I think Chèvre (goatskin) unstamped is also pretty durable? But yeah, not as structured as Saffiano though so I can imagine how it might be appealing.
Yes Prada saffiano doesn’t seem Lux and Hermes quality is questionable in my opinion
I agree! I don’t even really like the Hermes equivalent, epsom. It feels plasticky, not luxe.
True, in an attempt to be more durable, Saffiano and Epsom loses out on the luxe feel. But I think they do get softer with age, does that improve their feel?
No. It gets worse with age and they’re not able to be repaired because it’s not a natural grain. It’s stamped.
That’s unfortunate.
I think cloth straps make any bag look cheap!
Very true, especially on the new embroidered Lady Diors – just makes an extremely elegant purse look wayyy too casual.
I totally agree! A leather Prada bag I’m interested in purchasing is perfect except for the damn cloth shoulder strap. The other problem is they “pill” which quickly diminishes the look of the leather, too.
I’m hoping – for the sake of the earth and for the animals – that there will be advances in luxury handbags that do not involve using animal products. Then we won’t need statements like “faux leather is something that’s almost always advisable to avoid”. I recently bought a nicely designed and versatile cork handbag from “Laflore Paris” and I seriously love the look of it. Despite basically carrying only this one handbag since November (!!), it still looks like new (except for a problem with a strap but I think I can get a replacement). Plus I feel better about carrying something that wasn’t an animal at one point. It’s customer demand that will drive the luxury brands to make these things though. I’m open to other suggestions of such handbags if people know of them! Maybe a topic for another article here?
Agree! If you’re looking for high-quality vegan leather, consider Von Holzhausen. Their leather is super oft and durable. What’s more, the manufacturing process is carbon neutral whan definitely can’t be said about leather handbags.
I wish vegan leather wasn’t associated with plastic. It’s way more sustainable to produce. Did you know that leaving animal hides to rot instead of making them into leather would result in emitting less CO2?
I have several Stella McCartney bags. Vegan and beautiful!
What has been your experience with them – are they durable?
Indeed – most vegan leathers that we know of are just the plain old faux leathers, which is why Laflore’s cork leather and recently Hermès’ mushroom leather are all gaining popularity. We have yet to see if they’re all as durable and versatile as real leather though but I sincerely hope we do get more alternatives soon – thank you for raising the point!
What a weird article/post, in particular the final question.
I want my bags show good quality (in materials and craftmanship) and good taste. I want my bags to have a functional, interesting and stylish design that I find beautiful.
I do not give a hoot as to whether they LOOK expensive.
(Personally, I hate carrying a bag that showcases I have spent enough money on it to feed a family.)
I think there’s a difference between proclaiming expensive-ness and looking expensive, or at least, well-made. Most people would associate higher price with better quality – my apologies if the idea wasn’t clear. As you might have seen that I’ve already spoken about logo purses not looking ultra expensive – so I’m not talking about status signals here, rather stuff that makes purses look poorly-made/designed and hence, less expensive. The contrary works too – there are loads of contemporary purses that look a lot pricier due to the manufacturers’ attention to certain details.
Poor structure; ripped seams; uneven lines; cheap fabric used on the inside; a LOT of bling (unless it’s an evening bag) and/or the combo of multiple fabrics and colors and zippers and clasps and competing logos and…..just make up your mind what you want the bag to look like instead of throwing EVERYING into and onto the bag. I don’t like the mixing of metals either (not my thing) and I don’t care for plastic anything on a bag that costs thousands (cheap cheap cheap).
Very aptly put – plastic or equivalent hardware is indeed a big bummer.
Any bag that is carried by an influencer is a cheap bag and it costs nothing to the company selling it.
We do need to consider the millions in revenue that the influencers’ devout following brings to the brands in exchange of a few free purses though.
Everyone and their mother has an LV. Probably most are fake but won’t buy another
Especially the Neverfull. Wayy oversaturated.
Thin, flimsy materials. The Goyard St Louis? I don’t own one, but whenever I see it in the wild, just looks like it would fall apart. I’m not a Neverfull fan, but at least LV monogram canvas holds up, IMO.
I think the Goyards hold up fairly well too, although they do look plasticky. Same as the Neverfull’s handles – look like they’re about to snap any moment!
ALL of the shopping “totes” looks extremely cheap, and probably were inexpensive to make. It falls under the “trendy” cateagory also. Same with straw bags. Any bags that arent leather, gold, or gemstudded, can really be made for very little money and people know that. An inexpensive unknown name brand Italian leather bag (under $300-500) can look just as expensive as a Hermes imho.
Very true, and i actually have questions about the durability of a straw tote. I mean, even the Hermès and Loewe ones, how long do they last?
My husband just gifted me the Loewe straw bag for spring/summer. It’s beautiful! As far as durability I guess we will see but I feel at the moderate price point it’s worth the purchase.
Congratulations! Sounds like the perfect purse for summer!
Louie Viouton large bags. My friend always brings her large Louie when we go out to dinner on Saturday evening.
Is it the monogram version? Do you know which design it is?
what makes a handbag look inexpensive is how it is worn–not the bag itself.