Decoded: Breaking Down the DNA of Chanel

The philosophy that helps this legendary label live on

We all love a bit of mystery. It’s enticing, seductive, and keeps us on our toes. It also seems to be becoming more of a lost art.

In this day and age, it feels like we can find out everything we need to know about a person in only a few clicks. We are no longer comfortable with letting peoples’ assumptions about us run wild and thus we end up giving away some of our power when we are quick to combat anything untrue about ourselves. We do this because we want to be seen authentically, but what if being authentic was not defining ourselves by where we came from or where we currently are in life, but instead by where we are going and by who we feel we are destined to be?

An early believer of this philosophy was the ultra-chic and super secretive, Gabrielle (Coco) Chanel. Most fashion lovers only think of her as the original creator of the beloved 2.55 Classic Flap, woody perfume, and some stylish suits; however, her ability to turn herself into a legend by covering up the harsh truths of her early years reveals her to be so much more.

According to church records, Gabrielle was born on August 19, 1883, in Saumur, France – a tiny town just southwest of Paris where her roaming salesman father sold women’s undergarments at the time. Her mother was a laundress and tasked with being the primary caregiver to Gabrielle and her siblings since their father often left them alone to peddle corsets across the country. During this time, the only other men Gabrielle saw consistently were her brothers and clean-cut cavalry soldiers stationed in Saumur. And even that came to a bitter end when she and her siblings were sent away after their mother’s early death.

Now at an orphanage, she spent most of her time studying or practicing the fine arts of sewing and millinery (hat-making.) She never really dreamed of being a seamstress, but like most people throughout history, she put aside her dreams and pursued the opportunities that were available to her.

Excitingly enough, Gabrielle did eventually get the chance to dabble in her fantasies of being a singer when she began moonlighting at a small cabaret. This period of gracing the stage was brief but it wouldn’t be the end to her putting on a show for others.

Sewing by day and singing by night, she began to get better acquainted with the more well-to-do individuals of Saumur. The closer she got, the better she was able to understand what made them tick. She learned how to captivate others and used her prowess to draw people closer to her. This worked especially well on one military officer that took an immediate liking to her. Unbeknownst to her, their (rather illicit) relationship would become the launchpad for her future as a prolific socialite and designer.

The officer exposed her to new activities popular with the elite, like hunting and horseback riding. Gabrielle found that she liked being active but realized she couldn’t sufficiently enjoy such activities while wearing the constricting garments for women of the time. She avoided physical discomfort by opting for men’s clothes tailored to fit her petite frame. At the same time, she avoided social discomfort by embellishing stories of her own origins.

Everyone around her regarded her as unconventional yet charming in her own way. She embodied feelings of pleasure and comfort that put them at ease and seemed to mask her own less-than-glamorous upbringing.

During this time, she found herself finally being taken care of for the first time and she wasn’t about to let it go. She was living an easy, leisurely life but nevertheless, began to feel bored and longed for more than endless days of being wined and dined. She expressed her discontent to the officer who promptly gave her use of an apartment he owned in Paris that became both her primary residence and her first hat shop.

Her hats, like her new life, contrasted what she had seen growing up; Rather than being packed to the brim with flowers and feathers, they were simple, elegant, and featured bold clean lines that would become the defining feature of all of her future creations. The hat business boomed and her success as a female business owner gave her a level of notoriety that simply couldn’t be ignored. After three years, she opened her second shop in Deauville — a coastal playground for international high-society of the early twentieth century.

Still sewing and still participating in sports, her first clothing line was inspired by the refined shapes of menswear that she often wore. Each article of clothing was designed to stand alone without the need for shapewear and consisted of only comfy, loose cuts of natural fabrics. The most notable characteristic was the buttons on the front of the garments that allowed women to finally dress themselves.

“Luxury must be comfortable, otherwise it isn’t luxury” – Coco Chanel, 1964 Time Magazine

This mild gender-bending style became popular with creatives who enjoyed the androgynous styles of the 1920s and helped secure her position as part of the European in-crowd. She was frequently seen paling around with famous artists, actors, and poets and showed no signs of stopping — that is until the early 1940s when Germany began its swift occupation of northern France.

Having just settled disputes with employees that demanded wage increases, Coco became frustrated and began to get a lot of bad press for her sharp-tongued remarks about both situations. This brought her business to a screeching halt and resulted in a self-imposed exile across the Swiss border.

For fifteen years she funded her life in Switzerland with the money made from her massively successful perfume, Chanel No. 5, but when it was time to return to Paris she was met with competition from fellow French designer, Christian Dior. His elaborate outfits seemed nonsensical to Coco but played a hand in lifting the spirits of post-war residents that wanted to look towards the future of fashion and governance.

Coco was determined to remain on top and in 1954 she reintroduced her most famous piece of all time: the signature mélange skirt suit. Once again working to overcome her own understandings, she familiarized herself with the wants of her target customers. She redesigned the suit with a fancier fabric (tweed) and precious jewel-like buttons, as opposed to the relaxed natural fibers and plastic used on the original version. This gave the outfit the desired extravagance while allowing wearers to still move freely and gracefully.

When we look back at this snapshot of Coco’s life, we can see the speculation she created about herself wasn’t merely a dishonest ruse, but it was savvy and calculated, helping set her apart from so many others. Without carefully crafting her own persona, she would have never created opportunities for herself: to become a pioneer of fashion, to be a successful early businesswoman, and to be the decision-maker of her own life. And still today her influence runs deep in the DNA of the brand.

When I think of wearing Chanel, I am enthralled with the idea of not dressing for a job that I want, but rather dressing for the person I want to be. Those classic interlocking Cs seem so seductive to those of us who are determined to live life on our own terms. Like Coco, wearers of Chanel are true dandies: self-made people who pursue personal refinement to such a length that they sometimes create whole new personas for themselves. We may be a little bit mysterious (“Where did she get that? I wonder if it’s real?”) but Chanel lovers believe in being masters of our own destinies. We don’t need to be blue-blooded to be noble, nor upper-crust to be upscale — we believe that we can, therefore we are. It’s as simple as that.

“I am not a heroine, but I have chosen the person I wanted to be.” – Coco Chanel


Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links to our retail partners. If you make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Stay up-to-date in the world of bags, delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking Subscribe, you acknowledge our Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime via the link in every email.

guest

23 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
anonymouspeeps

Wait, what? You mean “…charging a King’s ransom…” isn’t it? 🙂
I kid, I kid.

TKS

I am rather shocked you completely avoided that she was a Nazi agent, and the “officer” you reference above was a high ranking Nazi officer. There are countless articles on this. She was no role model for women. https://www.biography.com/news/coco-chanel-nazi-agent

Lee

But you own Chanel products…right?

TKS

Nope. Not any more. Cognitive dissonance resolved itself.

TKS

The Wertheimers, a Jewish family, has owned Chanel for decades, which is the ultimate karma IMO. Brand founded by a Nazi, now owned by Jews. I have many other issues with Chanel, the company (quality, transparency, etc) but CC, other than the idolized vapor (as seen above, and not based in reality at all) isn’t the DNA of the company & hasn’t been for a long time. KL contributed more to Chanel than CC did.

Lee

In reality she is the “DNA” of the company because historically she founded it, but you can disagree, and sidestep the facts, as you see fit. You can change the narrative to fit your own agenda, as you are doing. The bottom line is you don’t like the founder, but you enjoy the products. Some may say that is hypocritical, for which I would agree. However, in the end it is your money to spend as you freely will. It hardly matters to me what you say or do.

TKS

You asked me if I had the products due to my cognitive dissonance with the brand. IMO the brand has disavowed CC in many ways due to her being a pretty disgusting human. I don’t “enjoy” the products. Why wound you say that? Or assume that?

Lee

You said in earlier posts that you own Chanel so it’s not an assumption. My point is you lament about the founder of this company, but you purchase Chanel products. For instance, I abhor D&G and will never purchase their products. So, I’m putting my money where my mouth is and not just talking the talk. Anyway, I’ve made my point. You do you, love!

TKS

You said “enjoy”. Very different. And I’ve long since sold all my Chanel. I don’t lament about anything, that implies spending time on it. Which I don’t. Not including brazen atrocities in Chanel’s “DNA” is an irresponsible omission. I do agree with you that buy whatever if you like it. It doesn’t make anyone a hypocrite to do so, as long as one is informed. The article above doesn’t allow for that, which was my original point before you decided to insert some targeted, asinine, frivolous, irrelevant snd tangential drivel.

Jenni

Slow down, you sound like a totally bitchy snob who gets off thinking they can call out people asserting an opinion different than yours. Seriously??!?? Grow up!!

TKS

And you do the same. When someone decided to troll MY comment, and changes the subject completely, damn straight I can call them out on making it personal, which was totally unnecessary. Wrong side to take sister.

MD

+1. Amen

helga sith

Maybe some of us agree with her?

Megan

If by “agree with her,” you mean that you agree with Nazi ideals and goals, then I and anyone with any humanity condemn your views.

Naomi

Who is the “her” that you agree with?

kate

We need to acknowledge that despite being a magnificent designer with an eye for detail and innovation, she was a racist, bigoted woman who had no empathy for anyone but herself. Not saying that this should reflect on the brand, but if we are talking of brand DNA, then we need to be honest about it’s history and any progress made to change some aspects that would not be desirable based on society today. This is not a genuine account of Coco Chanel’s history, just one that whitewashes the ugly truth about a vile woman who was brilliant.

Anonymous peeps

Exactly, true! Also, I read the last paragraph as ridiculous rhetoric re: wearing her designs, etc. For example: “Like Coco, wearers of Chanel are true dandies: self-made people who pursue personal refinement to such a length that they sometimes create whole new personas for themselves”. Wearing Chanel clothes doesn’t make me feel any sort of way. I simply dress for the occasion, nothing more.

Megan

This reads like myth-creating propaganda both by ignoring Coco Chanel’s ugly traits and actions and by describing Chanel customers in the last paragraph in such an eye-roll-inducing way. I love Chanel bags but I’d never be so self absorbed as to described myself as some sort of daring rule breaker because I’m carrying a $3000 purse.

Seres

I hesitated in posting this but hope it will be taken as constructive criticism. These “DNA Decoded” articles read like advertising copy that lacks any critical analysis. This entry in particular strains credulity. A more reflective, less unquestioning approach would be appreciated by this reader.

MD

This is just completely biased and disappointing. If future DNA articles are following this suit, then please just stop writing them.

Sajid Bin Mohammad

This article reads like a fairy tale, and ever so often, people are too eager to point out all the ways in which life is not. Coco Chanel may not have been an ideal person, but she is relatable. And all of us get to criticize her bad qualities because she had the freedom to do stuff on her own, sure she made mistakes, sure she didn’t end up the way we expect ideal people to be, but Chanel doesn’t want to be your ideal person. She’s probably smirking at all nay-sayers right now. I’m just glad Alejandra’s article transported me to a dreamy world, even for a few days.

Eve

A relatable, not an ideal person = a literal Nazi agent. Lol.

Zeynep Ganz

Everyone can have their own opinions. I myself do still love the brand while not loving who it’s founder is. I also agree with whomever posted below that Karl did more for this brand that CC did. CC is the founder and always will be, but KL defined and refined Chanel for many, many years and that fact should not be overlooked.

You May Also Like