In fashion, sometimes the worst thing you can say about a design is that it’s…fine. At least when a bag is cosmically awful, the designers tried a little bit of something. A chance was taken, a personality was exposed, and even if those kinds of adventures don’t always work out, it’s always encouraging to see a design who’s willing to gamble.

The Gucci Madison Ostrich Tote isn’t a bad bag by any stretch of imagination. I wouldn’t hesitate to carry it and I’d be proud to own it if it somehow came to be mine without any money changing hands, but I couldn’t imagine swiping a card to make this particular purse mine. The design doesn’t have enough visual interest to be eye-catching and the lines aren’t sharp enough to call it minimalist. It’s just…fine. And “fine” isn’t worth four grand.

Ostrich skin is an underused exotic to be sure, and no matter how noncommittal and bland it can be, tan is a useful color to have around. If the rest of the Gucci spring pre-orders that just popped up across the internet had been exciting and interesting, perhaps I’d feel more excitement about this bag. Unfortunately, they’re almost all tan, and they’re all…fine. In fact, this ostrich bag is the most exciting of the bunch, which is faint praise if I’ve ever given it. At least it’s lined in leather. Buy through Saks for $3900.

P.S. Please consider supporting our small, bag-loving team by clicking our links before shopping or checking out at your favorite online retailers like Amazon, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, or any of the listed partners on our shop page. We truly appreciate your support!

Share Your Thoughts With Us

  • papertiger

    I have seen this IRL and it is truly exquisite however I actually preffer the off-white version with croc trim and is ‘only’ $1,150

  • Elly

    I do not like anything about this bag – I am neither a fan of Ostrich skin nor Gucci. And while I too think a tan bag is useful, I wear black 95% of the time so I would find it foolish to invest almost $4000 in this kind of a bag. On a different note, it seems that for Spring 2011, Gucci is focusing more on leather and not on their monogram print, a change I will gladly welcome!

  • Daniella

    The bag looks very nice, but I don’t see much “design” on it. It’s just a plain normal tote.

  • Susan Todd

    I agree with the comments made, plus the handles look rather short for ease of getting the bag on to your shoulder. It seems like there could have been more thought by such a large design company before they debuted the bag. But, I am a huge fan of ostrich for lifetime purchases such as this.

  • Merve

    Its just ‘nice’. And nice is not a word for me and nice is not worth 4k.

  • jbbee

    It looks like one of those SWAG bags. I actually have one that looks exactly the same except that mine is red and made of polyester.

  • Couture Coco

    I absoulutely love tan and this is wonderful!

  • purseloco

    Simple, classy, understated!

  • edoardo

    I don’t liek the bag for a lot of motivations…. First of all it seems too much “old” and hasn’t any kind of design research. Furthermore the handle is “Not right” for this bag (terrible to put closed two different kinds of browns…)…In the end I can accpet this bag from an ancient factory put int he center of Milan but not from a cosmopolitan, and innovative, brand as Gucci is!

  • Mochababe73

    I am not a fan of ostrich so that was a turn off.
    I have never been a real fan of Gucci in the handbag department. The only thing that I could forsee myself buying from Gucci is a bag for my husband.

  • Vitta

    I love ostrich skin for its superb suppleness and longevity. And I usually like timeless Gucci designs. But not this one. I think it misses on character and its proportions are a bit off. I agree with edoardo that the handles are “not right” – they should be longer and/or heftier, to keep the balance in check. So, for me it’s a miss.

  • 19yearslater

    It’s ostrich and tan, which basically means that I would rarely use it even if I did get it for free.

  • Julie

    I usually despise Gucci but I actually like this. A lot. I am very surprised it’s Gucci. Worth $4000? No way. Give me Hermes anyday (but probably not in ostrich!)

  • Stylista

    I never liked ostrich skin. Much prefer leather. The colour is nice, but a bit dull.

  • Lorie

    If this is the same as in the ad in Elle this month, it is HUGE! I was shocked.

  • Selene Spencer

    I love, love, love Ostrich leather. It’s prettier and far easier to take care of in comparison to other exotic skins like Python or crocodile/alligator. I love Gucci in general but I do agree that this particular bag could have been so much more. However, for Gucci placing the design, when dealing with ostrich skin it’s not necessary to over focus on an intricate design as you want to show as much of the beautiful natural ostrich pattern as possible.
    However, the bag’s basic shape is not as glamorous as the skin/leather used so that mismatch makes this bag a miss for me.

  • bagstars

    The bag looks very nice

  • gucci girl
  • florencia

    love that purse, it would be great to carry mu (ipad)

  • ninjaninja

    I just love ostrich skin, so beautiful (ipad)

  • nini

    I love the tan. but it is too expensive.

  • nini

    I’ll buy if it was less expensive… (ipad)

  • Tiffany

    I love tan~~ (ipad)

  • Jelita78

    this is gucci?
    seriously, it doesn’t look like a gucci..
    it looks more like hmmm vintage tods.. with ostrich, that is.. agree.. it’s just “fine” (ipad)

  • Julia

    i actually really like this…it’s understated, simple and streamlined…although there is no way i would pay $4000 for it. maybe if it was less than half the price and in leather? (ipad)

  • helen

    I haven’t used fine for any of my comments yet. But I’ll keep that word in mind. (ipad)

  • Jen

    Nice bag…. A little bland.. (ipad)

  • beanyce126

    very nice, bring this back to the classic gucci style. (ipad)