
You don’t see much of Kate Winslet in the public eye. Here or there she is out and about, but she is not making headlines. And I assume this is just the way she likes it. She wants to just wear a loose fitting sweater and jeans and go about her daily life like the rest of ‘us’. She even wears Uggs, which are so comfortable but so hideous at the same time (Vlad hates them on me but when we were in Ohio I wore them constantly!!). Over the weekend, Kate decided not to go to the Oscars and lay low in New York City. Her bag of choice is the understated Tod’s Took Sacca Hobo in off-white, which is designed with calf skin leather and an adjustable shoulder strap. The handbag worked perfectly as Kate was out about in the City, offering ample room and a loose fit. There are two front flap pockets and one front zip pocket. Dimensions are 13″W X 12″H X 4½”D.

Tod’s Took Sacca Hobo in off-white | $1,750 via Saks

Took Multitashce Media in dark brown | $1,550 via eLuxury

Tod’s Took Tracolla Media in Brandy | $1,550 via Saks

Tod’s Took Tracolla Media in ruby red | $1,550 via eLuxury









I love Kate. She is so down to earth. Her style is very simple and classic and this bag hits the mark. The white version in the nicest.
I have a dislike for these outer pockets so many bags now share. If you are a perfectionist ,you surely know what´s in which pocket. But I don´t belong to this category and although it is bothersome to search things from your bag,I prefer mine to be without the extensions.
The bag looks real cute on her, better than their stock photo. As for Ugg’s, I wear them all winter long and am getting rather tired of them. So ready for strappy sandals!!
I dont think uggs are hideous! And Kate is lovely!
its cute, but isnt she wearing tod’s tracolla media and not the hobo?? just wondering….my dh hates uggs too, i guess they are not too sexy but i love them and where them all winter…
They’re all beautiful bags. I would usually go for the white as my favourite, but the ruby red is something else.
It’s definitely tracolla, not sacca.