The Marc Jacobs Stam is a MJ classic, both well-known and loved in the handbag world. With different renditions over time, there are some that we love and some that we question. Coming for Spring 2011, the Marc Jacobs Sequined Stam Bag is covered with tonal paillettes atop blush leather. Pre-order via Neiman Marcus for $2,350.
Fill in the blank in the comments section below: The Marc Jacobs Sequined Stam Bag is ____.
a joke? no good one though.
Seriously, Not a joke. Innovative.
I actually think it’s quite pretty…
Haven’t we discussed it already a month ago, on Dec. 31?
a disappointment.
I love the Stam. It’s on my ultimate wish list right behind a classic Chanel flap bag.
overpriced. Pailletes are cheap.
ugly. Why ruin such a beautifu leather (in quality and color) with ugly pailletes.
An old hat from the 1960’s converted into a handbag!
ugly!
Amanda got 156 comments on this bag on December 31…
further proof that he despises women.
Unique and I would rock it!!!
the love child of a gorgeous MJ stam and a seventh grade girl’s purse. I love the stam, but this is no good.
a confection but not practical.
Um-m-m-m…..tacky and dated.
I literally gasped when I saw it. So I am going to say Breathtaking! I love it!
phenomenal!!!! I love the colour too! 🙂
… really pretty and the blush color is gorgeous.
Fun, fun, fun! I love it! And, yes, beautiful color.
http://thechicaddict.blogspot.com
Not worth the price.
Cute, fun, playful and nothing like what I would expect from Mark http://bit.ly/iigZOj
quite frilly! Rather attractive!
Aren’t sequins over?
if he did it in a seafoam like colour it could be mermaid like!
this shade is pretty too i guess
a salmon…
Beautiful!!
fashionnews.zalando.co.uk
Just perfect for the right summer occasions.
last ditch lame effort to inundate us with even more Stams…
floral. it reminds me of flower petals from a flower. It gives on the illusion from afar. If that was what they were trying to go for, they should have made fabric flower petals instead – but then again. who knows. =P
very unneccessary. Doesn’t do the Stam any good, IMO.
cheap looking.
Don’t really like it. It will look like a moulting chicken when the paillettes start tearing off.
too much! Less is more
Too edgy and eccentric 😉
http://fashiondoesntexist.blogspot.com/
cheap looking
fishy! the paillettes make it look scaly, like its been fished out of the ocean! lol
not awful; its kinda cute actually, but at that price tag, no thanks.
I agree with Marianna: looks like a ’60s hat my Gran wore. I initially thought the paillettes were feathers. I love the blush colour, but the paillettes on this style of bag make it look like some poor bastard child of a fairy princess and Hell’s Angel. And at that price, I can definitely pass!
Something I want materializing out of nowhere in front of me RIGHT NOW!
http://red-soledfashionista.blogspot.com/
pretty.. but that price for a sequins bag? not to mention how much limitation it does to matching different styles of clothing? no thank you
childish
funky. I would have no trouble wearing it.
a mermaid’s dream.
I love it! So girly-girl.
sadly cheap looking 🙁 and i have a feeling it will scratch like h*ll