Press: Exclusive Status, It’s in The Bag

louis vuitton tribute patchwork bag Believe it or not, one of the ultra-exclusive Louis Vuitton Tribute Patchwork Bags is making its way into the nation’s capital. A super elite LV customer has ordered the $52,500 which is set to appear later this season. Ylan Q. Mui of the Washington Post interviewed me for her article, Exclusive Status: It’s in The Bag. Read the article below, and thanks again to Ylan!

Forget your Coach purse. Put away your Kate Spade. Even Hermes’s famous Birkin bag seems positively discount.

The Louis Vuitton Tribute Patchwork is this summer’s ultimate status bag, ringing in at $52,500. And it is arriving in Washington by the end of the season, ordered by a woman whose circumstances and identity the company has ever so politely (again and again) declined to disclose.

Some fashion followers, however, feel that history should not be sliced, diced and rearranged into one purse.

“Limited-edition handbags give us purse fanatics something to drool over, to lust after, to want,” said Meaghan Mahoney of Fort Lauderdale, Fla., who writes the Purse Blog. “But there comes a time when no matter how limited something is, no matter how much fuss goes behind it . . . the product just plain old sucks.”

Still, Mahoney said she would relish the opportunity to see the Tribute Patchwork with her own eyes.

“At least that way, those who are lucky enough to see the handbag in person will gain instant bragging rights,” she said. “After all, the bag is not much more than bragging material by itself.”

Read the entire article at Washington Post.

32 Responses to “Press: Exclusive Status, It’s in The Bag”

  1. MJ said:

    I keep looking at it again and again and it’s still ugly every time i look at it


  2. Highmaintenance said:

    :shock: OUTRAGEOUS!!!


  3. Anita said:

    This bag is ugly, who would be so stupid to fall for LV’s gimmic. Love LV but come on.


  4. Thi said:

    This bag must be a joke. Maybe the LV warehouse exploded, and this is the result. :lol:


  5. Pamperingbeki said:

    :lol:

    I must be the weirdo because I really dig it!


  6. Bagged said:

    Hideous…just hideous. The price tag is even more hilarious. :lol:


  7. purseloco said:

    Tacky is as Tacky does. :oops:


  8. justified said:

    ugly!expensive!…instead I would buy the 14 bags seperatly..instead of attached


  9. liz said:

    i thought beyonce was already pictured with this bag before?


  10. Kansashalo said:

    :oops: That bag looks like the LV warehouse barfed up its inventory! And for $52K????


  11. Otter said:

    This has to be a test from the marketing folks at LV. They want to figure out how stupid the public really is. This bag is FUUUUUUUUUUUUG! And I like LV.


  12. Conchita said:

    when is this bag going to die?! :evil:


  13. Pim said:

    the ugliest bag ever!


  14. Brooke said:

    I Wouldn’t even pay a dime for this purse…Ewwww


  15. Jae said:

    I actually saw a lady holding this bag a week ago!!Btw, I am from Perth, Australia…How can that be possible this bag exist here!???hmmm…


  16. kemilia said:

    I think I did see Beyonce with this hideous bag, she seemed to be holding it like it was a dead smelly thing.

    I still think this bag HAS TO BE A JOKE! “What can we make them carry next?”

    Has anyone knocked this one off yet, hmmmm, I MIGHT carry that one (LOL).


  17. chloebagfreak said:

    The bag needs to go into the trash and the money for it needs to go to a charity or to rebuild New orleans. LV is laughing all the way to the bank!


  18. chloebagfreak said:

    The bag needs to go into the trash and the money for it needs to go to a charity or to rebuild New orleans. LV is laughing all the way to the bank! :shock:


  19. Cidsa said:

    I don’t like LV at all, but at least most of their regular stuff is tolerable. This is just beyond fugly.. Just goes to prove that just because you are a designer or are rich, doesn’t mean you have any taste whatsoever. D:


  20. Tracie said:

    To be honest, I’ve never been into the designer scene.
    I read this story in my local paper yesterday and your blog was mentioned.

    So, my comment is this: What are these people thinking?
    I have roughly that much saved in my 401 K. My husband has nearly twice as much as I do.

    My husband and I do collect things, but nothing that expensive!

    I just can’t fathom spending that much on anything other than a house or car.

    Honestly, some people need to get a life.

    And what is it with ugly designer peices?
    I can understand if you genuinely like an article of clothing/handbag/shoes.

    But what is it with the people who are willing to shell out X amount for it because of the name no matter how hideous certain pieces are.

    Case in point that bag.

    It’s creepy to me. It’s a zombie like behavior.


  21. karry kasim said:

    OMG i wouldnt wear that if someone gave it to me for free! YUK


  22. janis said:

    I don’t like this bag either, but zombie behavior? Hey, we like our bags and that’s why we like this site. If you don’t then don’t log on…


  23. anne said:

    OMG..I’m a handbag whore but that bag is the most hideous thing I’ve ever seen. LV couldn’t pay me to carry it.


  24. Kairi said:

    That bag is the FUGLIEST thing I’ve ever laid my eyes upon.. i mean… EWWW! And to pay someone 52 grand to carry that hideous otrocity around???! They should be paying YOU that money..


  25. taitaiwanabe said:

    Think of it this way: it is so ugly so there wont be any fake ones.


  26. MICHELLE LIVINGSTON said:

    MY GOD THIS HAS TO BE THE UGLIEST BAG I HAVE EVER SEEN! NOW I KNOW WHY I SWITCHED TO CHANEL.


  27. monkeygrrl said:

    Well… it’s unique.


  28. carissa said:

    I understand the concept, but I don’t think there’s any way to pull it off without it being ugly. Sewing together a bunch of ANY bag would look stupid, and this is just a really overpriced example of that. More of a bizarre conversation piece than a bag.
    I agree that this kind of money should be put to better use than that bag. :???:


  29. Edgeplayer22 said:

    If you have to have this…go replica..it’s already there and it’s $320. It matches so close not even a seasoned LV shopper can tell..I’m one and I can’t..yipeeeee


  30. amanda said:

    where is the LV warehouse in harlem new york?


  31. ChAnEl said:

    :???: WAt is this I hate it but I love Louis V!!! they can do way better with $52,5000 bucks com eon now!!!!


  32. Kimberly said:

    agree, they could have done better for the price tag 52 G


Reply to this post:

Note: This post is over a year old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

Net-a-Porter